Start. Prepare glyph data. Create metadata file. Create script file. Create source file. Copyright (c) 2000-2011 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 23:14 GMT 25-Feb-2011-ML. Library based on sources from 13:48 GMT 22-Feb-2011. 0u0020 I'm sorry this file is too complex for me to understand (or is erroneous) 0u0021 0u0022 0u0023 0u0024 0u0025 0u0026 0u0027 0u0028 0u0029 0u002A 0u002B 0u002C 0u002D 0u002E 0u002F 0u0030 0u0031 0u0032 0u0033 0u0034 0u0035 0u0036 0u0037 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0038 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0039 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0040 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0041 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0042 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0043 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0044 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0045 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0046 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0047 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0048 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0049 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0050 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0051 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0052 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0053 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0054 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0055 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0056 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0057 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0058 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0059 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0060 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0061 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0062 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0063 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0064 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0065 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0066 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0067 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0068 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0069 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0070 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0071 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0072 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0073 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0074 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0075 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0076 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0077 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0078 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0079 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A0 I'm sorry this file is too complex for me to understand (or is erroneous) There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0100 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0101 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0102 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0103 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0104 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0105 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0106 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0107 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0108 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0109 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u010A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u010B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u010C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u010D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u010E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u010F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0110 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0111 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0112 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0113 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0114 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0115 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0116 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0117 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0118 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0119 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u011A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u011B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u011C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u011D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u011E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u011F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0120 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0121 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0122 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0123 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0124 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0125 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0126 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0127 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0128 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0129 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u012A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u012B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u012C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u012D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u012E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u012F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0130 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0131 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0132 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0133 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0134 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0135 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0136 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0137 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0138 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0139 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u013A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u013B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u013C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u013D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u013E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u013F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0140 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0141 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0142 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0143 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0144 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0145 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0146 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0147 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0148 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0149 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u014A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u014B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u014C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u014D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u014E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u014F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0150 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0151 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0152 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0153 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0154 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0155 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0156 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0157 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0158 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0159 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u015A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u015B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u015C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u015D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u015E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u015F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0160 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0161 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0162 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0163 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0164 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0165 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0166 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0167 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0168 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0169 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u016A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u016B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u016C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u016D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u016E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u016F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0170 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0171 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0172 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0173 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0174 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0175 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0176 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0177 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0178 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0179 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u017A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u017B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u017C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u017D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u017E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u017F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0180 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0181 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0182 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0183 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0184 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0185 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0186 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0187 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0188 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0189 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u018A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u018B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u018C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u018D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u018E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u018F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0190 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0191 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0192 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0193 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0194 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0195 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0196 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0197 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0198 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0199 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u019A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u019B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u019C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u019D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u019E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u019F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u01FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0200 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0201 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0202 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0203 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0204 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0205 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0206 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0207 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0208 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0209 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u020A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u020B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u020C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u020D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u020E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u020F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0210 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0211 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0212 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0213 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0214 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0215 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0216 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0217 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0218 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0219 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u021A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u021B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u021C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u021D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u021E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u021F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0220 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0221 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0222 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0223 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0224 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0225 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0226 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0227 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0228 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0229 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u022A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u022B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u022C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u022D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u022E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u022F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0230 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0231 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0232 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0233 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0234 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0235 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0236 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0237 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0238 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0239 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u023A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u023B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u023C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u023D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u023E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u023F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0240 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0241 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0242 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0243 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0244 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0245 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0246 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0247 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0248 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0249 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u024A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u024B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u024C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u024D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u024E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u024F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0250 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0251 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0254 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u025B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0261 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u026A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0275 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0283 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u028A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0300 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0301 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0303 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0304 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0308 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0309 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u030C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0323 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u037E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0384 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0385 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0386 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0387 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0388 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0389 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u038A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u038C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u038E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u038F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0390 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0391 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0392 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0393 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0394 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0395 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0396 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0397 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0398 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0399 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0400 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0401 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0402 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0403 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0404 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0405 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0406 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0407 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0408 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0409 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u040A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u040B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u040C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u040D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u040E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u040F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0410 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0411 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0412 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0413 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0414 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0415 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0416 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0417 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0418 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0419 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0420 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0421 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0422 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0423 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0424 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0425 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0426 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0427 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0428 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0429 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0430 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0431 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0432 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0433 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0434 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0435 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0436 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0437 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0438 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0439 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0440 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0441 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0442 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0443 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0444 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0445 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0446 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0447 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0448 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0449 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0450 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0451 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0452 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0453 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0454 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0455 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0456 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0457 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0458 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0459 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u045A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u045B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u045C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u045D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u045E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u045F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0490 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0491 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0E3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E12 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E52 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E56 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E5F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E63 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E64 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E65 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E67 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E68 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E6B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E6D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E6F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E75 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E78 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E7D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E8E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E96 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EAF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EBA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EBB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EBC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ECA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ECB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ECC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ECD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ECE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ECF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1ED9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EDA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EEC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1EFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2013 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2014 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2015 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2016 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2017 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2018 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2019 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2020 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2021 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2022 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2025 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. Generate .ttf file. Convert .ttf to XML file. Add xAvgCharWidth data into XML file. Convert XML file to .ttf file. Padding to a 4-byte boundary. Done.