Start. Prepare glyph data. Create metadata file. Create script file. Create source file. Copyright (c) 2000-2010 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 11:21 GMT 1-May-2010. Library based on sources from 03:43 GMT 29-Apr-2010. 0u0101 0u0113 0u011B 0u012B 0u014D 0u016B 0u01CE 0u01D0 0u01D2 0u01D4 0u01D6 0u01D8 0u01DA 0u01DC 0u2015 0u2018 0u2019 0u201C 0u201D 0u2026 0u2030 0u2032 0u2033 0u203B 0u2103 0u2116 0u2160 0u2161 0u2162 0u2163 0u2164 0u2165 0u2166 0u2167 0u2168 0u2169 0u216A 0u216B 0u2190 0u2191 0u2192 0u2193 0u2208 0u220F 0u2211 0u221A 0u221D 0u221E 0u2220 0u2225 0u2227 0u2228 0u2229 0u222A 0u222B 0u222E 0u2234 0u2235 0u2236 0u2237 0u223D 0u2248 0u224C 0u2260 0u2261 0u2264 0u2265 0u226E 0u226F 0u2299 0u22A5 0u2312 0u2460 0u2461 0u2462 0u2463 0u2464 0u2465 0u2466 0u2467 0u2468 0u2469 0u2474 0u2475 0u2476 0u2477 0u2478 0u2479 0u247A 0u247B 0u247C 0u247D 0u247E 0u247F 0u2480 0u2481 0u2482 0u2483 0u2484 0u2485 0u2486 0u2487 0u2488 0u2489 0u248A 0u248B 0u248C 0u248D 0u248E 0u248F 0u2490 0u2491 0u2492 0u2493 0u2494 0u2495 0u2496 0u2497 0u2498 0u2499 0u249A 0u249B 0u2500 0u2501 0u2502 0u2503 0u2504 0u2505 0u2506 0u2507 0u2508 0u2509 0u250A 0u250B 0u250C 0u250D 0u250E 0u250F 0u2510 0u2511 0u2512 0u2513 0u2514 0u2515 0u2516 0u2517 0u2518 0u2519 0u251A 0u251B 0u251C 0u251D 0u251E 0u251F 0u2520 0u2521 0u2522 0u2523 0u2524 0u2525 0u2526 0u2527 0u2528 0u2529 0u252A 0u252B 0u252C 0u252D 0u252E 0u252F 0u2530 0u2531 0u2532 0u2533 0u2534 0u2535 0u2536 0u2537 0u2538 0u2539 0u253A 0u253B 0u253C 0u253D 0u253E 0u253F 0u2540 0u2541 0u2542 0u2543 0u2544 0u2545 0u2546 0u2547 0u2548 0u2549 0u254A 0u254B 0u25A0 0u25A1 0u25B2 0u25B3 0u25C6 0u25C7 0u25CB 0u25CE 0u25CF 0u2605 0u2606 0u2640 0u2642 0u02C7 0u02C9 0u3000 I'm sorry this file is too complex for me to understand (or is erroneous) 0u3001 0u3002 0u3003 0u3005 0u3008 0u3009 0u300A 0u300B 0u300C 0u300D 0u300E 0u300F 0u3010 0u3011 0u3013 0u3014 0u3015 0u3016 0u3017 0u3041 0u3042 0u3043 0u3044 0u3045 0u3046 0u3047 0u3048 0u3049 0u304A 0u304B 0u304C 0u304D 0u304E 0u304F 0u3050 0u3051 0u3052 0u3053 0u3054 0u3055 0u3056 0u3057 0u3058 0u3059 0u305A 0u305B 0u305C 0u305D 0u305E 0u305F 0u3060 0u3061 0u3062 0u3063 0u3064 0u3065 0u3066 0u3067 0u3068 0u3069 0u306A 0u306B 0u306C 0u306D 0u306E 0u306F 0u3070 0u3071 0u3072 0u3073 0u3074 0u3075 0u3076 0u3077 0u3078 0u3079 0u307A 0u307B 0u307C 0u307D 0u307E 0u307F 0u3080 0u3081 0u3082 0u3083 0u3084 0u3085 0u3086 0u3087 0u3088 0u3089 0u308A 0u308B 0u308C 0u308D 0u308E 0u308F 0u3090 0u3091 0u3092 0u3093 0u30A1 0u30A2 0u30A3 0u30A4 0u30A5 0u30A6 0u30A7 0u30A8 0u30A9 0u30AA 0u30AB 0u30AC 0u30AD 0u30AE 0u30AF 0u30B0 0u30B1 0u30B2 0u30B3 0u30B4 0u30B5 0u30B6 0u30B7 0u30B8 0u30B9 0u30BA 0u30BB 0u30BC 0u30BD 0u30BE 0u30BF 0u30C0 0u30C1 0u30C2 0u30C3 0u30C4 0u30C5 0u30C6 0u30C7 0u30C8 0u30C9 0u30CA 0u30CB 0u30CC 0u30CD 0u30CE 0u30CF 0u30D0 0u30D1 0u30D2 0u30D3 0u30D4 0u30D5 0u30D6 0u30D7 0u30D8 0u30D9 0u30DA 0u30DB 0u30DC 0u30DD 0u30DE 0u30DF 0u30E0 0u30E1 0u30E2 0u30E3 0u30E4 0u30E5 0u30E6 0u30E7 0u30E8 0u30E9 0u30EA 0u30EB 0u30EC 0u30ED 0u30EE 0u30EF 0u30F0 0u30F1 0u30F2 0u30F3 0u30F4 0u30F5 0u30F6 0u30FB 0u3105 0u3106 0u3107 0u3108 0u3109 0u310A 0u310B 0u310C 0u310D 0u310E 0u310F 0u3110 0u3111 0u3112 0u3113 0u3114 0u3115 0u3116 0u3117 0u3118 0u3119 0u311A 0u311B 0u311C 0u311D 0u311E 0u311F 0u3120 0u3121 0u3122 0u3123 0u3124 0u3125 0u3126 0u3127 0u3128 0u3129 0u3220 0u3221 0u3222 0u3223 0u3224 0u3225 0u3226 0u3227 0u3228 0u3229 0u0391 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0392 0u0393 0u0394 0u0395 0u0396 0u0397 0u0398 0u0399 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0401 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0410 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0411 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0412 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0413 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0414 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0415 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0416 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0417 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0418 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0419 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0420 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0421 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0422 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0423 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0424 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0425 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0426 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0427 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0428 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0429 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0430 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0431 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0432 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0433 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0434 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0435 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0436 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0437 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0438 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0439 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0440 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0441 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0442 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0443 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0444 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0445 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0446 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0447 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0448 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0449 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0451 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E52 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E56 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E5F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E8E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EBA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EBB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ECA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ECB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ECD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ECE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ED1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ED3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ED4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ED5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ED6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ED7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ED8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4ED9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EEC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EF2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EF6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F5F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F63 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F64 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F65 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F67 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F6F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4F9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FAF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FCA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FCE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FCF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FD0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FDA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4FFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u500C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u500D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u500F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5012 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5014 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5018 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5019 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u501A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u501C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u501F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5021 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5025 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5026 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5028 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5029 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u502A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u502C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u502D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u502E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u503A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u503C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u503E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5043 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5047 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5048 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u504C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u504E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u504F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5055 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u505A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u505C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5065 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u506C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5076 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5077 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u507B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u507E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u507F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5080 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5085 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5088 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u508D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u50FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5106 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5107 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u510B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5112 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5121 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u513F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5140 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5141 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5143 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5144 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5145 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5146 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5148 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5149 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u514B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u514D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5151 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5154 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5155 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5156 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u515A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u515C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5162 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5165 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5168 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u516B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u516C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u516D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u516E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5170 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5171 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5173 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5174 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5175 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5176 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5177 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5178 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5179 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u517B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u517C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u517D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5180 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5181 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5182 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5185 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5188 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5189 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u518C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u518D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5192 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5195 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5196 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5197 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5199 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u519B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u519C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u51FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5200 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5201 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5202 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5203 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5206 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5207 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5208 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u520A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u520D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u520E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5211 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5212 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5216 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5217 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5218 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5219 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u521A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u521B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u521D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5220 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5224 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5228 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5229 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u522B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u522D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u522E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5230 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5233 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5236 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5237 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5238 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5239 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u523A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u523B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u523D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u523F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5240 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5241 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5242 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5243 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u524A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u524C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u524D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5250 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5251 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5254 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5256 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u525C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u525E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5261 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5265 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5267 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5269 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u526A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u526F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5272 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u527D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u527F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5281 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5282 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5288 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5290 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5293 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u529B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u529D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u529E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u529F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u52FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5300 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5305 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5306 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5308 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u530D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u530F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5310 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5315 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5316 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5317 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5319 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u531A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u531D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5320 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5321 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5323 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5326 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u532A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u532E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5339 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u533A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u533B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u533E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u533F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5341 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5343 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5345 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5347 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5348 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5349 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u534A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u534E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u534F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5351 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5352 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5353 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5355 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5356 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5357 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u535A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u535C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u535E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u535F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5360 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5361 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5362 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5363 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5364 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5366 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5367 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5369 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u536B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u536E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u536F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5370 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5371 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5373 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5374 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5375 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5377 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5378 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u537A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u537F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5382 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5384 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5385 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5386 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5389 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u538B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u538C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u538D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5395 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5398 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u539A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u539D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u539F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u53FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5401 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5403 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5404 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5406 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5408 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5409 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u540A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u540C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u540D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u540E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u540F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5410 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5411 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5412 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5413 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5415 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5416 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5417 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u541B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u541D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u541E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u541F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5420 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5421 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5423 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5426 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5427 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5428 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5429 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u542B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u542C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u542D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u542E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u542F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5431 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5432 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5434 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5435 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5438 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5439 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u543B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u543C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u543E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5440 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5443 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5446 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5448 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u544A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u544B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5450 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5452 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5453 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5454 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5455 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5456 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5457 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5458 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5459 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u545B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u545C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5462 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5464 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5466 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5468 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5471 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5472 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5473 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5475 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5476 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5477 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5478 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u547B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u547C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u547D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5480 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5482 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5484 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5486 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u548B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u548C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u548E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u548F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5490 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5492 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5494 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5495 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5496 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5499 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u549A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u549B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u549D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u54FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5501 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5506 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5507 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5509 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u550F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5510 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5511 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5514 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u551B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5520 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5522 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5523 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5524 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5527 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u552A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u552C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u552E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u552F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5530 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5531 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5533 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5537 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u553C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u553E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u553F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5541 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5543 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5544 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5546 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5549 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u554A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5550 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5555 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5556 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u555C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5561 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5564 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5565 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5566 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5567 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u556A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u556C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u556D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u556E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5575 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5576 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5577 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5578 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u557B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u557C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u557E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5580 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5581 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5582 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5583 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5584 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5587 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5588 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5589 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u558A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u558B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u558F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5591 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5594 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5598 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5599 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u559C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u559D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u559F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u55FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5600 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5601 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5608 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5609 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u560C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u560E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u560F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5618 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u561B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u561E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u561F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5623 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5624 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5627 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u562C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u562D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5631 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5632 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5634 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5636 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5639 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u563B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u563F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u564C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u564D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u564E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5654 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5657 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5658 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5659 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u565C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5662 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5664 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5668 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5669 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u566A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u566B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u566C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5671 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5676 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u567B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u567C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5685 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5686 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u568E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u568F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5693 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u56FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5703 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5704 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5706 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5708 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5709 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u570A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u571C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u571F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5723 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5728 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5729 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u572A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u572C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u572D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u572E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u572F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5730 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5733 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5739 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u573A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u573B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u573E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5740 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5742 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5747 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u574A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u574C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u574D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u574E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u574F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5750 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5751 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5757 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u575A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u575B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u575C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u575D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u575E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u575F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5760 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5761 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5764 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5766 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5768 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5769 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u576A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u576B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u576D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u576F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5773 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5776 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5777 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u577B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u577C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5782 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5783 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5784 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5785 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5786 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u578B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u578C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5792 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5793 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u579B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u57FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5800 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5802 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5806 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5807 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u580B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u580D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5811 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5815 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5819 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u581E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5820 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5821 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5824 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u582A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5830 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5835 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5844 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u584C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u584D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5851 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5854 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5858 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u585E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5865 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u586B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u586C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u587E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5880 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5881 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5883 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5885 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5889 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5892 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5893 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5899 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u589A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u589E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u589F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u58F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5902 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5904 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5907 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u590D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u590F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5914 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5915 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5916 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5919 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u591A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u591C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u591F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5924 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5925 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5927 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5929 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u592A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u592B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u592D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u592E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u592F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5931 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5934 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5937 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5938 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5939 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u593A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u593C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5941 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5942 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5944 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5947 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5948 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5949 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u594B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u594E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u594F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5951 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5954 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5955 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5956 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5957 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5958 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u595A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5960 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5962 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5965 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5973 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5974 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5976 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5978 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5979 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u597D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5981 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5982 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5983 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5984 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5986 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5987 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5988 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u598A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u598D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5992 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5993 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5996 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5997 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5999 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u599E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u59FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A67 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A75 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5A9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5ABE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5ACC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5ADC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5AF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B5F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B63 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B64 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B65 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B75 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B7D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5B9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BB0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BB4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BD0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5BFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C63 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C65 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C6F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C96 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5C9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CCB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5CFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D6B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D6F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5D9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DCD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DE7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DF2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DF4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5DFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E78 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E7D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E96 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5E9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5ECA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5ED1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5ED2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5ED3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5ED6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EF4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EF6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5EFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F52 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F56 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F64 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F6D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5F9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FBC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FCD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FCF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FD0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FE7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u5FFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6000 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6001 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6002 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6003 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6004 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6005 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6006 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u600A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u600D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u600E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u600F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6012 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6014 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6015 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6016 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6019 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u601B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u601C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u601D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6020 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6021 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6025 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6026 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6027 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6028 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6029 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u602A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u602B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u602F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6035 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u603B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u603C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u603F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6041 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6042 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6043 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u604B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u604D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6050 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6052 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6055 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6059 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u605A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u605D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6062 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6063 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6064 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6067 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6068 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6069 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u606A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u606B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u606C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u606D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u606F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6070 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6073 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6076 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6078 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6079 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u607A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u607B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u607C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u607D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u607F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6083 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6084 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6089 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u608C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u608D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6092 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6094 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6096 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u609A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u609B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u609D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u609F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u60FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6100 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6101 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6106 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6108 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6109 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u610D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u610E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u610F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6115 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u611A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u611F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6120 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6123 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6124 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6126 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6127 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u612B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u613F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6148 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u614A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u614C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u614E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6151 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6155 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u615D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6162 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6167 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6168 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6170 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6175 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6177 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u618B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u618E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6194 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u619D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u61FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6206 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6208 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u620A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u620B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u620C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u620D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u620E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u620F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6210 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6211 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6212 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6215 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6216 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6217 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6218 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u621A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u621B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u621F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6221 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6222 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6224 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6225 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u622A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u622C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u622E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6233 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6234 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6237 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u623D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u623E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u623F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6240 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6241 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6243 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6247 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6248 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6249 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u624B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u624C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u624D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u624E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6251 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6252 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6253 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6254 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6258 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u625B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6263 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6266 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6267 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6269 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u626A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u626B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u626C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u626D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u626E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u626F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6270 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6273 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6276 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6279 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u627C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u627E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u627F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6280 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6284 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6289 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u628A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6291 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6292 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6293 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6295 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6296 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6297 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6298 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u629A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u629B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u629F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u62FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6301 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6302 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6307 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6308 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6309 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u630E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6311 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6316 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u631A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u631B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u631D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u631E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u631F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6320 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6321 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6322 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6323 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6324 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6325 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6328 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u632A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u632B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u632F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6332 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6339 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u633A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u633D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6342 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6343 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6345 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6346 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6349 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u634B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u634C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u634D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u634E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u634F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6350 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6355 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u635E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u635F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6361 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6362 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6363 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6367 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6369 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u636D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u636E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6371 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6376 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6377 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u637A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u637B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6380 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6382 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6387 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6388 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6389 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u638A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u638C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u638E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u638F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6390 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6392 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6396 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6398 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u63FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6400 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6401 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6402 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6405 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u640B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u640C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u640F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6410 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6413 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6414 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u641B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u641C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u641E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6420 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6421 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6426 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u642A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u642C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u642D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6434 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u643A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u643D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u643F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6441 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6444 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6445 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6446 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6447 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6448 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u644A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6452 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6454 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6458 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u645E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6467 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6469 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u646D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6478 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6479 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u647A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6482 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6484 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6485 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6487 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6491 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6492 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6495 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6496 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6499 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u649E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u64E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6500 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6509 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6512 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6518 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6525 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u652B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u652E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u652F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6534 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6535 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6536 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6538 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6539 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u653B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u653E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u653F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6545 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6548 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6549 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u654C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u654F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6551 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6555 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6556 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6559 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u655B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u655D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u655E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6562 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6563 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6566 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u656B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u656C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6570 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6572 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6574 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6577 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6587 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u658B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u658C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6590 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6591 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6593 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6597 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6599 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u659B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u659C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u659F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u65FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6600 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6602 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6603 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6606 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u660A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u660C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u660E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u660F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6613 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6614 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6615 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6619 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u661D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u661F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6620 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6625 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6627 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6628 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u662D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u662F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6631 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6634 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6635 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6636 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u663C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u663E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6641 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6643 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u664B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u664C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u664F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6652 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6653 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6654 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6655 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6656 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6657 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u665A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u665F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6661 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6664 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6666 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6668 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u666E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u666F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6670 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6674 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6676 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6677 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u667A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u667E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6682 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6684 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6687 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u668C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6691 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6696 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6697 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u669D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u66FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6700 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6708 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6709 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u670A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u670B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u670D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6710 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6714 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6715 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6717 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u671B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u671D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u671F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6726 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6728 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u672A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u672B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u672C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u672D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u672F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6731 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6734 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6735 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u673A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u673D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6740 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6742 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6743 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6746 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6748 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6749 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u674C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u674E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u674F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6750 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6751 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6753 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6756 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u675C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u675E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u675F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6760 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6761 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6765 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6768 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6769 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u676A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u676D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u676F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6770 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6772 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6773 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6775 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6777 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u677C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u677E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u677F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6781 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6784 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6787 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6789 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u678B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6790 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6795 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6797 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6798 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u679A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u679C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u679D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u679E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u67FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6800 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6805 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6807 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6808 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6809 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u680A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u680B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u680C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u680E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u680F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6811 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6813 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6816 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6817 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u681D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6821 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6829 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u682A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6832 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6833 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6837 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6838 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6839 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u683C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u683D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u683E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6840 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6841 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6842 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6843 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6844 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6845 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6846 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6848 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6849 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u684A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u684C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u684E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6850 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6851 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6853 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6854 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6855 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6860 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6861 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6862 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6863 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6864 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6865 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6866 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6867 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6868 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6869 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u686B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6874 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6876 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6877 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6881 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6883 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6885 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6886 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u688F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6893 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6897 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u68FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6901 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6905 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u690B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u690D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u690E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6910 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6912 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u691F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6920 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6924 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u692D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6930 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6934 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6939 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u693D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u693F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6942 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6954 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6957 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u695A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u695D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u695E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6960 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6963 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6966 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u696B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u696E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6971 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6977 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6978 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6979 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u697C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6980 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6982 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6984 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6986 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6987 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6988 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6989 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u698D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6994 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6995 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6998 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u699B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u699C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u69FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A65 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A8E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6A97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6AA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6AA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6AAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6AAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B63 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B64 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B65 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B67 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B96 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6B9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BB4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BCB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BCD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BCF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6BFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C5F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C64 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C68 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C7D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6C9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CBB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CBC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CCA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CD0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CF6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6CFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D12 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D52 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D63 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D6F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D78 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D8E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6D9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DAF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DCB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DEC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6DFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E56 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E5F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E6B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6E9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EAF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EB4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EBA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EBB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6ECB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6ECF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6ED1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6ED3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6ED4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6ED5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6ED7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EDA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EF4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6EF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F6D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F78 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F8E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6F9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u6FEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7011 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u701A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u701B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7023 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7035 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7039 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u704C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u704F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u705E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u706B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u706C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u706D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u706F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7070 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7075 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7076 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7078 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u707C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u707E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u707F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7080 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7085 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7089 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u708A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u708E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7092 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7094 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7095 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7096 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7099 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u709C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u709D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u70FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7109 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u710A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7110 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7113 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7115 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7116 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7118 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7119 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u711A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7126 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u712F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7130 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7131 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7136 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7145 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u714A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u714C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u714E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u715C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u715E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7164 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7166 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7167 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7168 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u716E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7172 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7173 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7178 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u717A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u717D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7184 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u718A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u718F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7194 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7198 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7199 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u719F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u71F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7206 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u721D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7228 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u722A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u722C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7230 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7231 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7235 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7236 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7237 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7238 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7239 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u723B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u723D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u723F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7247 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7248 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u724C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u724D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7252 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7256 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7259 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u725B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u725D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u725F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7261 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7262 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7266 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7267 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7269 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u726E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u726F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7272 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7275 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7279 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u727A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u727E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u727F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7280 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7281 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7284 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u728A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u728B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u728D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u728F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7292 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u729F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u72FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7301 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7303 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u730A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u730E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7313 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7315 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7316 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7317 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u731B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u731C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u731D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u731E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7321 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7322 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7325 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7329 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u732A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u732B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u732C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u732E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7331 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7334 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7337 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7338 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7339 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u733E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u733F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u734D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7350 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7352 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7357 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7360 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u736C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u736D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u736F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u737E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7384 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7387 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7389 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u738B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u738E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7391 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7396 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u739B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u739F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u73F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7403 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7405 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7406 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7409 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u740A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u740F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7410 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u741A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u741B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7422 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7425 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7426 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7428 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u742A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u742C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u742E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7430 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7433 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7434 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7435 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7436 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u743C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7441 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7455 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7457 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7459 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u745A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u745B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u745C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u745E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u745F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u746D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7470 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7476 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7477 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u747E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7480 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7481 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7483 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7487 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u748B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u748E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7490 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u749C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u749E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u74FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7504 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u750D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u750F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7511 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7513 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7518 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7519 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u751A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u751C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u751F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7525 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7528 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7529 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u752B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u752C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u752D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u752F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7530 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7531 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7532 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7533 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7535 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7537 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7538 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u753A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u753B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u753E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7540 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7545 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7548 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u754B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u754C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u754E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u754F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7554 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7559 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u755A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u755B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u755C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7565 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7566 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u756A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7572 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7574 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7578 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7579 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u757F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7583 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7586 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u758B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u758F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7591 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7592 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7594 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7596 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7597 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7599 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u759A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u759D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u759F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u75FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7600 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7601 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7603 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7605 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u760A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u760C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7610 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7615 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7617 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7618 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7619 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u761B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u761F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7620 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7622 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7624 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7625 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7626 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7629 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u762A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u762B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u762D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7630 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7633 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7634 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7635 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7638 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u763C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u763E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u763F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7640 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7643 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u764C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u764D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7654 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7656 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u765C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u765E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7663 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u766B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u766F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7678 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u767B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u767D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u767E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7682 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7684 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7686 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7687 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7688 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u768B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u768E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7691 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7693 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7696 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7699 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u76FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7701 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7704 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7707 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7708 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7709 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u770B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u770D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7719 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u771A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u771F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7720 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7722 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7726 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7728 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7729 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u772D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u772F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7735 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7736 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7737 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7738 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u773A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u773C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7740 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7741 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7743 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7747 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7750 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7751 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u775A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u775B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7761 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7762 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7763 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7765 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7766 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7768 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u776B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u776C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7779 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u777D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u777E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u777F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7780 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7784 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7785 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u778C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u778D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u778E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7791 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7792 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u779F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u77FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7800 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7801 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7802 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7809 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u780C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u780D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7811 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7812 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7814 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7816 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7817 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7818 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u781A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u781C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u781D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u781F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7823 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7825 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7826 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7827 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7829 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u782C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u782D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7830 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7834 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7837 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7838 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7839 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u783A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u783B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u783C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u783E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7840 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7845 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7847 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u784C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u784E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7850 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7852 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7855 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7856 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7857 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u785D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u786A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u786B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u786C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u786D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u786E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7877 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u787C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7887 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7889 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u788C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u788D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u788E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7891 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7893 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7897 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7898 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u789A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u789B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u789C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u789F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u78FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7901 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7905 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7913 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u791E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7924 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7934 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u793A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u793B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u793C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u793E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7940 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7941 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7946 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7948 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7949 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7953 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7956 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7957 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u795A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u795B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u795C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u795D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u795E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u795F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7960 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7962 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7965 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7967 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7968 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u796D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u796F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7977 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7978 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u797A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7980 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7981 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7984 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7985 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u798A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u798F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u799A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u79FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A78 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A96 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7A9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ABF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ACB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ADE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ADF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7AFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B52 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B56 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B75 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7B9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BB4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BDA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7BFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C7D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7C9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CBC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CC8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CCA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CCD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7CFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7D0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7D20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7D22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7D27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7D2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7D2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7D6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7D77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7DA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7DAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7E3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7E41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7E47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7E82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7E9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7E9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EAF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EB0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EBA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ECA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ECB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ECC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ECD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ECE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ECF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ED0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ED1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ED2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ED3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ED4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ED5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ED7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ED8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7ED9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EDA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EE7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EF2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EF4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EF6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7EFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F12 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F5F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F68 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F8E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7F9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FAF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FB0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FBC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FCA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FCE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u7FFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8000 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8001 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8003 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8004 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8005 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8006 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u800B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u800C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u800D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8010 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8012 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8014 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8015 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8016 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8017 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8018 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8019 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u801C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8020 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8022 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8025 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8026 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8027 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8028 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8029 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u802A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8031 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8033 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8035 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8036 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8037 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8038 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u803B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u803D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u803F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8042 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8043 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8046 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u804A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u804B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u804C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u804D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8052 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8054 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8058 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u805A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8069 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u806A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8071 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u807F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8080 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8083 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8084 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8086 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8087 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8089 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u808B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u808C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8093 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8096 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8098 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u809A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u809B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u809C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u809D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u809F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u80FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8102 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8106 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8109 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u810A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u810D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u810E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u810F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8110 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8111 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8112 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8113 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8114 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8116 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8118 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u811A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u811E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u812C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u812F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8131 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8132 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8136 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8138 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u813E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8146 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8148 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u814A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u814B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u814C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8150 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8151 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8153 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8154 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8155 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8159 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u815A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8160 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8165 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8167 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8169 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u816D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u816E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8170 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8171 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8174 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8179 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u817A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u817B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u817C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u817D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u817E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u817F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8180 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8182 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8188 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u818A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u818F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8191 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8198 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u819B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u819C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u819D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u81FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8200 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8201 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8202 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8204 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8205 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8206 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u820C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u820D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8210 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8212 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8214 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u821B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u821C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u821E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u821F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8221 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8222 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8223 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8228 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u822A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u822B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u822C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u822D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u822F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8230 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8231 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8233 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8234 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8235 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8236 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8237 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8238 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8239 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u823B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u823E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8244 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8247 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8249 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u824B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u824F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8258 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u825A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u825F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8268 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u826E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u826F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8270 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8272 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8273 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8274 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8279 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u827A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u827D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u827E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u827F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8282 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8284 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8288 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u828A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u828B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u828D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u828E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u828F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8291 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8292 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8297 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8298 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8299 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u829C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u829D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u829F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u82FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8301 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8302 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8303 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8304 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8305 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8306 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8307 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8308 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8309 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u830C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u830E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u830F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8311 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8314 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8315 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8317 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u831A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u831B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u831C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8327 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8328 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u832B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u832C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u832D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u832F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8331 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8333 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8334 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8335 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8336 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8338 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8339 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u833A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u833C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8340 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8343 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8346 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8347 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8349 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u834F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8350 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8351 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8352 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8354 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u835A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u835B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u835C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u835E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u835F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8360 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8361 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8363 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8364 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8365 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8366 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8367 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8368 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8369 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u836A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u836B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u836C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u836D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u836E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u836F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8377 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8378 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u837B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u837C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u837D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8385 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8386 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8389 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u838E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8392 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8393 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8398 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u839B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u839C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u839E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u83FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8401 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8403 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8404 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8406 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u840B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u840C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u840D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u840E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u840F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8411 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8418 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u841C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u841D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8424 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8425 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8426 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8427 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8428 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8431 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8438 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u843C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u843D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8446 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8451 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8457 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8459 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u845A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u845B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u845C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8461 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8463 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8469 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u846B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u846C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u846D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8471 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8473 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8475 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8476 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8478 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u847A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8482 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8487 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8488 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8489 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u848B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u848C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u848E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8497 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8499 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u849C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u84FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u850C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8511 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8513 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8517 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u851A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u851F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8521 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u852B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u852C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8537 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8538 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8539 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u853A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u853B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u853C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u853D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8543 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8548 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8549 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u854A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8556 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8559 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u855E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8564 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8568 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8572 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8574 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8579 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u857A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u857B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u857E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8584 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8585 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8587 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u858F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u859B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u859C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u85FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8605 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8611 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8616 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8627 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8629 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8638 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u863C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u864D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u864E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u864F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8650 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8651 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8654 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u865A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u865E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8662 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u866B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u866C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u866E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8671 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8679 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u867A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u867B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u867C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u867D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u867E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u867F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8680 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8681 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8682 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u868A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u868B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u868C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u868D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8693 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8695 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u869C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u869D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u86FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8700 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8702 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8703 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8707 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8708 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8709 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u870A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u870D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8712 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8713 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8715 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8717 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8718 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u871A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u871C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u871E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8721 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8722 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8723 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8725 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8729 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u872E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8731 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8734 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8737 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u873B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u873E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u873F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8747 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8748 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8749 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u874C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u874E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8753 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8757 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8759 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8760 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8763 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8764 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8765 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u876E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8770 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8774 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8776 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u877B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u877C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u877D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u877E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8782 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8783 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8785 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8788 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u878B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u878D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8793 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8797 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u879F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u87FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8803 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u880A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8813 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8815 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8816 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u881B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8821 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8822 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8832 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8839 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u883C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8840 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8844 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8845 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u884C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u884D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8854 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8857 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8859 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8861 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8862 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8863 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8864 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8865 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8868 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8869 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u886B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u886C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u886E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8870 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8872 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8877 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u887D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u887E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u887F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8881 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8882 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8884 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8885 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8888 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u888B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u888D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8892 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8896 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u889C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u88FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8902 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u890A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8910 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8912 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8913 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8919 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u891A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u891B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8921 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8925 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u892A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u892B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8930 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8934 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8936 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8941 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8944 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u895E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u895F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8966 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u897B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u897F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8981 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8983 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8986 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u89F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8A00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8A07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8A3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8A48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8A79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8A89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8A8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8A93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8B07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8B26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8B66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8B6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BAF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BB0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BB4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BBA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BBC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BC8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BCA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BCB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BCD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BCE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BCF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BDA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BEC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8BFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C12 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C6B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C78 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8C98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D56 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D63 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D64 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D67 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D6B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D6D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D75 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8D9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DB4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DBA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DBC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DBF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DCB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DCE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DCF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DDA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DEC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8DFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E52 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E6D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E6F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8E9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8EAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8EAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8EAF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8EB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8EBA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8ECE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F67 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F68 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F6B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F6D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F6F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F75 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F78 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F7D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F8E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F96 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8F9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FB0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FB9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FC8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FCE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FD0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u8FFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9000 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9001 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9002 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9003 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9004 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9005 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9006 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9009 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u900A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u900B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u900D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u900F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9010 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9011 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9012 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9014 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9016 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9017 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u901A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u901B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u901D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u901E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u901F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9020 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9021 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9022 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9026 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u902D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u902E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u902F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9035 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9036 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9038 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u903B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u903C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u903E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9041 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9042 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9044 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9047 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u904D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u904F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9050 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9051 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9052 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9053 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9057 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9058 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u905B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9062 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9063 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9065 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9068 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u906D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u906E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9074 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9075 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u907D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u907F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9080 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9082 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9083 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9088 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u908B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9091 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9093 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9095 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9097 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9099 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u909B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u909D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u90FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9102 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9104 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9119 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u911E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9122 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9123 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u912F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9131 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9139 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9143 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9146 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9149 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u914A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u914B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u914C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u914D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u914E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u914F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9150 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9152 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9157 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u915A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u915D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u915E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9161 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9162 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9163 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9164 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9165 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9169 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u916A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u916C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u916E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u916F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9170 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9171 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9172 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9174 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9175 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9176 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9177 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9178 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9179 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u917D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u917E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u917F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9185 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9187 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9189 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u918B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u918C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u918D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9190 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9191 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9192 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u919A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u919B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u91DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9274 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u928E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u92AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u92C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u933E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u936A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u938F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u93CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u93D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u943E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u946B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9485 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9486 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9487 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9488 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9489 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u948A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u948B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u948C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u948D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u948E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u948F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9490 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9492 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9493 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9494 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9495 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9497 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9499 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u949A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u949B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u949C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u949D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u949E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u949F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u94FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9500 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9501 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9502 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9503 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9504 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9505 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9506 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9507 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9508 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9509 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u950A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u950B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u950C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u950D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u950E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u950F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9510 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9511 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9512 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9513 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9514 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9515 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9516 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9517 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9518 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9519 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u951A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u951B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u951D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u951E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u951F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9521 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9522 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9523 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9524 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9525 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9526 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9528 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9529 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u952A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u952B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u952C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u952D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u952E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u952F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9530 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9531 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9532 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9534 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9535 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9536 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9537 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9538 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9539 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u953A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u953B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u953C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u953E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u953F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9540 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9541 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9542 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9544 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9545 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9546 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9547 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9549 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u954A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u954C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u954D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u954E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u954F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9550 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9551 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9552 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9553 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9554 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9556 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9557 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9558 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9559 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u955B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u955C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u955D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u955E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u955F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9561 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9562 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9563 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9564 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9565 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9566 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9567 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9568 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9569 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u956A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u956B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u956C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u956D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u956F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9570 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9571 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9572 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9573 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9576 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u957F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u95FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9600 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9601 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9602 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9603 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9604 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9605 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9606 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9608 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9609 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u960A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u960B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u960C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u960D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u960E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u960F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9610 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9611 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9612 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9614 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9615 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9616 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9617 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9619 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u961A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u961C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u961D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u961F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9621 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9622 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u962A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u962E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9631 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9632 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9633 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9634 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9635 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9636 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u963B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u963C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u963D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u963F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9640 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9642 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9644 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9645 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9646 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9647 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9648 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9649 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u964B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u964C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u964D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9650 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9654 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9655 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u965B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u965F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9661 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9662 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9664 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9667 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9668 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9669 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u966A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u966C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9672 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9674 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9675 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9676 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9677 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9685 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9686 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9688 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u968B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u968D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u968F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9690 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9694 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9697 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9698 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9699 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u969C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u96FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9700 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9701 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9704 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9706 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9707 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9708 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9709 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u970D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u970E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u970F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9713 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9716 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u971C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u971E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u972A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u972D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9730 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9732 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9738 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9739 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u973E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9752 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9753 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9756 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9759 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u975B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u975E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9760 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9761 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9762 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9765 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9769 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9773 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9774 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9776 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u977C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9785 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u978B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u978D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9791 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9792 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9794 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9798 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u97F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9875 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9876 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9877 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9878 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9879 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u987A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u987B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u987C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u987D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u987E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u987F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9880 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9881 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9882 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9883 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9884 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9885 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9886 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9887 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9888 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9889 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u988A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u988C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u988D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u988F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9890 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9891 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9893 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9894 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9896 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9897 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9898 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u989A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u989B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u989C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u989D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u989E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u989F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u98E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u990D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9910 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u992E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9954 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9955 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9963 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9965 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9967 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9968 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9969 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u996A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u996B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u996C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u996D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u996E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u996F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9970 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9971 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9972 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9974 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9975 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9976 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9977 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u997A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u997C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u997D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u997F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9980 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9981 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9984 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9985 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9986 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9987 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9988 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u998A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u998B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u998D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u998F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9990 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9991 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9992 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9993 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9994 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9995 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9996 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9997 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9998 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9999 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u99A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u99A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A6D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A6F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A75 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A78 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A7D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A96 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9A9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AB0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ABA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ABC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ACB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ACC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ADF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9AFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9B54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C8E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9C9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CB0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CB3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CB4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CB5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CB6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CB7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CBA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CBB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CBC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CCA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CCB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CCD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CCE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CCF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CD0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9CE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E63 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E64 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E67 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E68 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E6B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E6D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9E9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EB4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EB8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EBB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EBD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EBE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ECD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ECE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ECF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ED1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ED4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9ED8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EE7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9EFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9F9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u9FA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF12 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF52 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF56 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFFE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFFE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFFE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFFE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. Generate .ttf file. Convert .ttf to XML file. Add xAvgCharWidth data into XML file. Convert XML file to .ttf file. Padding to a 4-byte boundary. Done.